On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 13:54 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> I tried with CLOG 24 also and I got linear performance upto 1250 users
> after which it started to tank. 32 got us to 1350 users before some
> other bottleneck overtook it.
Jignesh,
Thanks for testing that.
It's not very clear to eve
I tried with CLOG 24 also and I got linear performance upto 1250 users
after which it started to tank. 32 got us to 1350 users before some
other bottleneck overtook it.
Based on what Tom said earlier, it might then make sense to make it a
tunable with the default of 8 but something one can c
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 16:09 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> This patch seems to work well (both with 32 and 64 value but not with 16
> and the default 8).
Could you test at 24 please also? Tom has pointed out the additional
cost of setting this higher, even in workloads that don't benefit from
Hi Simon,
This patch seems to work well (both with 32 and 64 value but not with 16
and the default 8). Is there a way we can integrate this in 8.3?
This will improve out of box performance quite a bit for high number of
users (atleat 30% in my OLTP test)
Regards,
Jignesh
Simon Riggs wrote
