Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:40:25 -0400
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though?
On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large
as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark r
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:40:25 -0400
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though?
> On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large
> as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark runs you're
> referring t
"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg,
>
>> What I was referring to by "passing" TPC-E was the criteria for a conformant
>> benchmark run. TPC-C has iirc, only two relevant criteria: "95th percentile
>> response time < 5s" and "average response time < 95th percentile response
>> time".
Greg,
What I was referring to by "passing" TPC-E was the criteria for a conformant
benchmark run. TPC-C has iirc, only two relevant criteria: "95th percentile
response time < 5s" and "average response time < 95th percentile response
time". You can pass those even if 1 transaction in 20 takes 10-
