Ants Aasma writes:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniele Varrazzo
> wrote:
>> Is this a known planner shortcoming or something unexpected, to be
>> escalated to -bugs? Server version is 9.0.1.
> The relevant code is in scalararraysel() function. It makes the
> assumption that element wise co
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniele Varrazzo
wrote:
> Is this a known planner shortcoming or something unexpected, to be
> escalated to -bugs? Server version is 9.0.1.
The relevant code is in scalararraysel() function. It makes the
assumption that element wise comparisons are completely indep
Hello,
We have a table with about 60M records, almost all of which in one of
two statuses ('done', 'failed') and a few of them, usually < 1000, in
different transient statuses. We also have a partial index indexing
the transient items: where status not in ('done', 'failed'). Stats are
about right
