"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:09 -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> just a small 'me too' here, the RI penalty seems higher than it should
>> be...especially when the foreign key table is very small, and I can
>> see how this would impact benchmarks.
>
> An
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:09 -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 7/25/07, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Should you get the chance I would appreciate a comparative test for
> > TPC-E.
> >
> > 1. Normal TPC-E versus
> > 2. TPC-E with all FKs against Fixed tables replaced with CHECK( co
On 7/25/07, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:03 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> > my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> > even better (I know we've
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:07 +0200, Mario Weilguni wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > I have reasonable evidence that Referential Integrity is the major
> > performance bottleneck and would like some objective evidence that this
> > is the case.
>
> Just curious, will 8.3 st
Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> I have reasonable evidence that Referential Integrity is the major
> performance bottleneck and would like some objective evidence that this
> is the case.
Just curious, will 8.3 still check FK constraints (and use locks) even if the
referencing col
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:03 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> > my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> > even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
> > compl
On 7/20/07, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim,
> Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
> complete 8.2 -> 8.3 n
On Jul 20, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Jim,
Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to
use in my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without
HOT would be even better (I know we've got HOT-specific
benchmarks, but I want complete 8.2 -> 8.3 number
Jim,
Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchma
Sorry for the cross-post, but this is performance and advocacy
related...
Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use
in my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT
would be even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I
want comp
10 matches
Mail list logo
