Re: [PERFORM] 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL

2009-04-13 Thread Glyn Astill
--- On Mon, 13/4/09, Greg Smith wrote: > From: Greg Smith > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL > To: "Glyn Astill" > Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, "Kevin Grittner" > > Date: Monday, 13 April, 2009, 9:25 AM > On Fri, 10

Re: [PERFORM] 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL

2009-04-13 Thread Greg Smith
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Glyn Astill wrote: So it was only for connections over a unix socket, but wow; it's still an ongoing issue. The problem is actually with pgbench when running on a UNIX socket, not with the PostgreSQL server itself. On my tests, the actual database server itself seems to

Re: [PERFORM] 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL

2009-04-10 Thread Glyn Astill
--- On Fri, 10/4/09, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Glyn Astill wrote: > > I was thinking about shifting my home test machine up > from 2.6.18, > > however I recall reading a post somewhere a while back > about the > > scheduler in more recent versions being a bit > cranky... > > A recent post o

Re: [PERFORM] 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL

2009-04-10 Thread Kevin Grittner
Glyn Astill wrote: > I was thinking about shifting my home test machine up from 2.6.18, > however I recall reading a post somewhere a while back about the > scheduler in more recent versions being a bit cranky... A recent post on the topic: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/200

[PERFORM] 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL

2009-04-10 Thread Glyn Astill
Hi chaps, Is anyone using 2.6.26 with postgres? I was thinking about shifting my home test machine up from 2.6.18, however I recall reading a post somewhere a while back about the scheduler in more recent versions being a bit cranky... I just thought I'd ask before I go ahead, I don't have to