> A lot of data, but not a lot of records... I don't know if that's
> valid. I guess the people at Greenplum and/or Sun have more exciting
> stories ;)
Not really. Pretty much multi-terabyte tables are fine on vanilla
PostgreSQL if you can stick to partitioned and/or indexed access. If you
n
Chris,
On 1/18/07 1:42 PM, "Chris Mair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A lot of data, but not a lot of records... I don't know if that's
> valid. I guess the people at Greenplum and/or Sun have more exciting
> stories ;)
You guess correctly :-)
Given that we're Postgres 8.2, etc compatible, that
Is there any experience with Postgresql and really huge tables? I'm
talking about terabytes (plural) here in a single table. Obviously the
table will be partitioned, and probably spread among several different
file systems. Any other tricks I should know about?
We have a problem of that f
Brian Hurt wrote:
> Is there any experience with Postgresql and really huge tables? I'm
> talking about terabytes (plural) here in a single table. Obviously the
> table will be partitioned, and probably spread among several different
> file systems. Any other tricks I should know about?
>
> We
