Hello!
I would like to ask following question:
I have created a table and I updated all records.
And I executed this update command again and again
Execution time was growing after each step.
I cannot understand this behavior.
First update command took 6 sec, 30th update (same) command took 3
optimizer perceived rows
Other more accurate heuristics like relative distribution of columns would
be harder to track in the application,
and I'd rather let the database do that by issuing the analyze
Regards,
Virag
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTE
optimizer believes the number of
rows are ?
The tables in question have multi-column primary keys.
Regards,
Virag
am_heapobj bo
(cost=0.00..4.33 rows=1 width=43) (actual time=0.294..0.300 rows=1
loops=6259)
Index Cond: ((bo.heap_id = 0) AND (bo.objaddr =
"outer".childaddr))
Total runtime: 9950.192 ms
Regards,
Virag
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL
ime=0.018..0.022 rows=1
loops=6259)
Index Cond: ((bo.heap_id = 0) AND (bo.objaddr =
"outer".childaddr)) Total runtime: 566044.187 ms(21
rows)
Regards,
Virag
..2.01 rows=1 width=8)
(never executed) Index Cond: (22 =
trace_id)
Regards,
Virag
- Original Message -
From: "Szűcs Gábor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Avoiding cartesian
product
&g
I have a table which stores cumulative valuesI
would like to display/chart the deltas between successive data
collections
If my primary key only increments by 1, I could
write a simple query
select b.gc_minor - a.gc_minor, b.gc_major -
a.gc_major from jam_trace_sys a, jam_trace_sys b wh
.executeQuery(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:240)
at jsp._testexplain_2ejsp._jspService(_testexplain_2ejsp.java:82)
at org.gjt.jsp.HttpJspPageImpl.service(HttpJspPageImpl.java:75)
Regards,
Virag
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forge