Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:46:23PM +, teknokrat wrote:
I've read about the place. Would using -O3 be an improvement?
In my experience, it's not only not an improvement, it sometimes
breaks the code. That's on 8, though, not 9.
A
thanks, i remember
can anyone tell me what the best way to compile postgresql 7.4.1 on
Solaris 9 (UltraSparcIII) is? I have latest gmake and gcc installed. I
was going to use CFLAGS="-O2 -fast -mcpu=ultrasparc" based on snippets
I've read about the place. Would using -O3 be an improvement?
thanks
--
Rod Taylor wrote:
The references are all to the same table i.e. they are employee ids, so
leaving some and not others would make no sense. The table has no
deletes, small amount of inserts and moderate amount of updates. However
there are many selects and its their performance I am most concerne
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, teknokrat wrote:
I have a table that has about 20 foreign key constraints on it. I think
this is a bit excessive and am considering removing them ( they are all
related to the same table and I don't think there is much chance of any
integrity viola
I have a table that has about 20 foreign key constraints on it. I think
this is a bit excessive and am considering removing them ( they are all
related to the same table and I don't think there is much chance of any
integrity violations ). Would this improve performance or not?
thanks
