Re: [PERFORM] Joins and full index scans...mysql vs postgres?

2006-02-22 Thread ryan groth
ion performance? Is there an optimization I am missing? Ryan > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, ryan groth wrote: > > > Does this work: > > > > "Merge Left Join (cost=0.00..2656.36 rows=6528 width=1522) (actual > > time=0.057..123.659 rows=6528 loops=1)" > >

Re: [PERFORM] Joins and full index scans...mysql vs postgres?

2006-02-22 Thread ryan groth
; Index Scan using useraux_pkey on useraux (cost=0.00..846.40 > rows=7582 width=262) (actual time=0.007..11.935 rows=7529 loops=1)" > "Total runtime: 127.442 ms" > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:26:47PM -0500, ryan groth wrote: > > > Postgres Explain &

Re: [PERFORM] Joins and full index scans...mysql vs postgres?

2006-02-22 Thread ryan groth
Scan using phorum_users_base_pkey on phorum_users_base (cost=0.00..822.92 rows=9902 width=1168) (actual time=0.007..15.674 rows=9845 loops=1)" " -> Index Scan using useraux_pkey on useraux (cost=0.00..846.40 rows=7582 width=262) (actual time=0.007..11.935 rows=7529 loops=1)" &quo

[PERFORM] Joins and full index scans...mysql vs postgres?

2006-02-22 Thread ryan groth
I am issing a query like this: SELECT * FROM users users LEFT JOIN phorum_users_base ON users.uid = phorum_users_base.user_id LEFT JOIN useraux ON useraux.uid = users.uid; The joins are all on the PKs of the tables. It takes 1000ms to run on postgres. The identical mysql version runs in 2