Re: [PERFORM] CPU load

2008-09-29 Thread kiki
> kiki wrote: >> The speed of the query is not a problem but the strange thing is the >> processor load with postmaster when the query is executed. >> I don’t now how to reduce processor load. > > Did you try without the ORDER BY? > Where are the execution plans?

Re: [PERFORM] CPU load

2008-09-29 Thread kiki
Hello Herald, the queried table is used for communication between server application and web user interface. When application detects an event it writes it down in table. The web client checks every 10 second if something new is written in the table. Usually nothing new is written but the client h

Re: [PERFORM] CPU load

2008-09-29 Thread kiki
Sorry, without LIMIT returns around 70 rows. Tried to index date column and time column but the performance is pretty much the same. Everything is OK, I just don’t understand way is this query burdening the processor so much. Regards, Maja > kiki wrote: >> First I have

Re: [PERFORM] CPU load

2008-09-29 Thread kiki
ing the process id for the where clause (where procpid = ). > > How often is the table being queried modified? Between the startup when > the > query is fast, and when it slows down, is there a lot of modification to > its > rows? > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Albe

Re: [PERFORM] CPU load

2008-09-26 Thread kiki
Thank's for your response. The situation is that the top result is when the server is already exhibiting problems. The number of rows returned by the query varies, right now is: 49 row(s) Total runtime: 3,965.718 ms The table currently has 971582 rows. But the problem is that when database serv

[PERFORM] CPU load

2008-09-25 Thread kiki
Hello, postmaster heavily loads processor. The database is accessed from java aplication (with several threads), C applications and from PHP scripts. It seems that one php script, called periodicaly, rises the load but the script is very simple, something like this: $var__base = new baza($dbhost