Ya..sure...Migration to 9.2 is one of the activities planned and in fact
it's already on track.Thanks Thomas
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Thomas Kellerer [via PostgreSQL] <
ml-node+s1045698n5768973...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> bsreejithin wrote on 29.08.2013 18:13:
> > Po
Thanks Joshua..Will look to use connection pooler which Igor mentioned..
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-clustering-for-scale-out-works-in-PostgreSQL-tp5768917p5768961.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ok Igor..Will check out PgBouncer..Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-clustering-for-scale-out-works-in-PostgreSQL-tp5768917p5768960.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-perfo
The performance test that was conducted was for 1 Hour.
There are 6 transactions. 2 DB inserts and 4 SELECTs.
Every 2 minutes there will be 4 SELECTs. And every 3 minutes there will be 2
DB inserts.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-clustering-for-sc
Thanks a lot Joshua and others who have responded..
I am sorry about not putting in more details in my initial post.
What I posted is about a new setup that's going to come up..Discussions are
on whether to setup DB cluster to handle 1000 concurrent users.
DB cluster was thought of because of th
I am *expecting 1000+ hits to my PostgreSQL DB* and I doubt my standalone DB
will be able to handle it.
So I want to *scale out by adding more servers to share the load*. For this,
I want to do clustering.
I am *curious to know how clustering works in PostgreSQL.* (I don't want to
know how to se
