Quoting Scott Marlowe :
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Wayne Beaver wrote:
Quoting Scott Marlowe :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Wayne Beaver wrote:
Quoting Scott Marlowe :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Wayne Beaver
wrote:
I'd seen autovacs running for hours and ha
Quoting Scott Marlowe :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Wayne Beaver wrote:
Quoting Scott Marlowe :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Wayne Beaver wrote:
I'd seen autovacs running for hours and had mis-attributed this to
growing query times on those tables - my thought was
Quoting Scott Marlowe :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Wayne Beaver wrote:
I'd seen autovacs running for hours and had mis-attributed this to growing
query times on those tables - my thought was that "shrinking" the tables
"more quickly" could make them "more-
em resources? I would think that a full
speed manual vacuum would be a lot worse.
Wayne Beaver writes:
Running Pg 8.3RC2, Linux server, w/8GB RAM, OpenSuSE 10.2 OS (yes, I
know that's old). I have seen *really* long-running autovacs eating up
system resources. While the below is not an
Hi All,
Running Pg 8.3RC2, Linux server, w/8GB RAM, OpenSuSE 10.2 OS (yes, I
know that's old). I have seen *really* long-running autovacs eating up
system resources. While the below is not an example of *really* long,
it shows how I killed an autovac which had been running for more than
1
