Re: [PERFORM] Hash Join performance

2009-03-13 Thread Vamsidhar Thummala
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Vamsidhar Thummala writes: > > I am wondering why are we subtracting the entire Seq Scan time of > Lineitem > > from the total time to calculate the HashJoin time. > > Well, if you're trying to identify the speed of

Re: [PERFORM] Hash Join performance

2009-03-13 Thread Vamsidhar Thummala
Thanks for such quick response. On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > 2) Why is the Hash Join (top most) so slow? > > Doesn't look that bad to me. The net time charged to the HashJoin node > is 186107.210 - 53597.555 - 112439.592 = 20070.063 msec. In addition it > would be reason

[PERFORM] Hash Join performance

2009-03-13 Thread Vamsidhar Thummala
>From the documentation, I understand that range of actual time represents the time taken for retrieving the first result and the last result respectively. However, the following output of explain analyze confuses me: GroupAggregate (cost=632185.58..632525.55 rows=122884 width=57) (actual time=18