On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
>
> for two reasons:
>
> - some of the overhead of bgwriter and checkpoints is more or less linear
> in the size of shared_buffers, for example it could be possible that a
> large quantity of data could be dirty when a checkpoint occurs).
>
>
we manage,
I'll get you the stats.
Thanks!
Tony
Tony Kay
TeamUnify, LLC
TU Corporate Website <http://www.teamunify.com/>
TU Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/teamunify> | Free OnDeck Mobile
Apps<http://www.teamunify.com/__corp__/ondeck/>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:00 A
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 15.10.2013 01:00, Tony Kay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running 9.1.6 w/22GB shared buffers, and 32GB overall RAM on a
> > 16 Opteron 6276 CPU box. We limit connections to roughly 120, but
> > our web
transaction blocking other things would drive the
CPUs so hard into the ground with user time.
Tony
Tony Kay
TeamUnify, LLC
TU Corporate Website <http://www.teamunify.com/>
TU Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/teamunify> | Free OnDeck Mobile
Apps<http://www.teamunify.com/__corp__/ondec
d familiar to anyone, and if so, please advise.
Thanks in advance,
Tony Kay
