unregister
Ok thanks everybody for the calrification, after all now I allready learned
something new... ;)
My employer is currently thinking about migration to 8.2.x because of your
feedback, so I think that the problem could be resolved... ;)
Thanks to everyone...
Sven Clement
2007/8/6, Heikki
the
7.x.xversions under the command REINDEX where they claim that you
should run a
reindex under certain circumstances and for my comprehension this says that
with some access pattern (as ours (major writes / one big delete per day))
the index may be corrupted or otherwise not really useful.
Sven Clement
froze the version waiting for an major
update.
Thanks really to everybody here who already helped me a lot... Thanks!!!
Sven Clement
2007/8/4, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Andrew Kroeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With the table definitions you posted, one of th
readable when you receive it... ;)
2007/8/3, Mark Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 06:52 -0700, Sven Clement wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > as I'm new to this list I hope that it is the right place to post this
> > and also the r
to be retrieved very quickly if
we want to act based on the telemetric data.
So I'm asking me if it is useful to update to the actual 8.2 version and if
we could experience performance improvement only by updating.
Thank you for your answers,
Sven Clement