On 2005-09-30 01:21, Lane Van Ingen wrote:
> (3) Assure that a disk-based table is always in memory (outside of keeping
> it in
> memory buffers as a result of frequent activity which would prevent
> LRU
> operations from taking it out) ?
I was wondering about this too. IMO it would
On 2005-06-22 10:55, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> There has been discussion in the past on storing the time zone name
> with the timestamptz as well, though no one has implemented this yet.
The reason for this may be that time zone names (abbreviations) are not
unique. For example, "ECT" can mean
On 2005-04-17 14:56, Alex wrote:
> Is there a performance difference between the two?
As Christopher already pointed out, it depends on what you want to do.
If you're doing some complex string processing, it will be easier (and
in some cases) faster to do in plperl, if you're mainly dealing with
s
On 2005-03-31 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>Now *that* I want to see. Aught to be at least as interesting
>> >>as the "TCP/IP over carrier pigeon" experiment - and more
>> >>challenging to boot!
..
> Interestingly, we had a follow on contract to investigate routing
> optimization using floo
sarlav kumar wrote, On 2004-12-20 15:40:
> I would like to do a pg_dump on the test database, and restore it in
> the new database on Postgres 7.4.6. I would like to know if there
> would be any problem due to the postgres version/OS change. If so,
> could someone tell me what precautions I can tak
