Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-15 Thread Samba GUEYE
tamodel to workaround the inheritance foreigh key issue but i will at least test it because we have limited resources and can't afford to have many servers or whatever to boost performances... Best Regards Le 15/03/2011 14:18, Shaun Thomas a écrit : On 03/15/2011 05:10 AM, Samba GUEYE

Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-15 Thread Samba GUEYE
2 month because i thought that partitioning was a possible solution that doesn't offer me Apache Derby for my large table problem so if these questions sounds "dummy" for you this is a postgresql novice talking to you. Regards Le 14/03/2011 20:40, Robert Haas a écrit : On Mon,

Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-14 Thread Samba GUEYE
at 3:25 AM, Samba GUEYE wrote: The measure insertion is successful but problems raise up when inserting in the simpleMeasure table because it can't find the foreign key inserted the measure table and do not look at the partitionned tables Yes, that's how it works. -- Sent via pg

Re: [PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-10 Thread Samba GUEYE
2011 23:01, Jim Nasby a écrit : On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Samba GUEYE wrote: I have a problem with table partitioning because i have a foreign key applied on the partionned table and it throw a constraint violation error during inserts. I saw on the manual (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/i

[PERFORM] Table partitioning problem

2011-03-08 Thread Samba GUEYE
Hello, I have a problem with table partitioning because i have a foreign key applied on the partionned table and it throw a constraint violation error during inserts. I saw on the manual (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/ddl-inherit.html caveats section) that it's a limitation du