On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:06 PM, std pik wrote:
> Hi all..
> Can any one help me?
> I'd like to know how can we get the following information in
> PostgreSQL:
> Execution plan
> The I/O physical reads and logical reads, CPU consumption, number of
> DB block used, and any other information relevan
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> El Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:04:49 -0500
> I've taken down the article and I'll bring up it again when I've
> collected new numbers.
Please do, this subject is very interesting.
Regards.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performa
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:14 AM, marcin mank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
> wrote:
>> Just as a question to Tom and team,
>
> maybe it`s time for asktom.postgresql.org? Oracle has it :)
+1
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgres
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Madison Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'cust_id' references the customer that the given data belongs to. The
> reason for this "data bucket" (does this structure have a proper name?) is
> that the data I need to store on a give customer is quite variable an
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Decibel! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to trim down your EAV table.
Egads! I'd say completely get rid of this beast and redesign it
according to valid relational concepts.
This post pretty much explains the whole issue with EAV:
http://groups.google.com/gr
