Re: [Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with Sarge compared

2006-09-12 Thread Piñeiro
ot;outer".codigoreparacion = "inner".codigoreparacion) AND ("outer".codigoempresa = "inner".codigoempresa) AND ("outer".codigotienda = "inner".codigotienda)) -> Index Scan using codigosiniestro_pk on siniestro (cost=0.00..3638.2

[Fwd: Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody]

2006-09-12 Thread Piñeiro
Sorry I answer the message only to Scott Marlowe. I re-send the response - Mensaje reenviado De: Piñeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody Fecha: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:36

Re: [PERFORM] Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody

2006-09-12 Thread Piñeiro
4.2 there are more indices, or there was duplicated indices with the woody version too? (before you comment this: yes I try to remove the duplicate indices to check if this was the problem) -- Piñeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---(end of broadcast)

[PERFORM] Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody

2006-09-11 Thread Piñeiro
codigobanco, pago.codigooficina, pago.numerocuenta, pago.esAPlazos,pago.pagosRealizados,pago.numeroVencimientos,pago.fechainicio, pago.esdomiciliacion order by participantecompany.nombre,facturaabono.numeroFactura); Any idea ? -- Piñeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster