AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Kostyrka escribió:
> * Peter Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070404 14:40]:
> > This may be a silly question but: will not 3 times as many disk drives
> > mean 3 times higher probability for disk failure? Also rumor has it
> > that SATA drives
This may be a silly question but: will not 3 times as many disk drives
mean 3 times higher probability for disk failure? Also rumor has it
that SATA drives are more prone to fail than SCSI drivers. More
failures will result, in turn, in more administration costs.
Thanks
Peter
On 4/4/07, [EMAIL P
On 2/27/07, Shane Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Davis wrote:
>> Sorry for for not being familar with storage techonologies... Does
>> "battery" here mean battery in the common sense of the word - some
>> kind of independent power supply? Shouldn't the disk itself be backed
>> by a batte
On 2/26/07, Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 23:11 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> A related question:
> Is it sufficient to disable write cache only on the disk where pg_xlog
> is located? Or should write cache be disabled on both disks?
>
When
A related question:
Is it sufficient to disable write cache only on the disk where pg_xlog
is located? Or should write cache be disabled on both disks?
Thanks
Peter
On 2/25/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question is: does PostgreSQL have
