Hi,
We have been using the current version of postgres i.e. 9.1.4 with
streaming replication on. While vacuuming we noticed that certain dead rows
are not getting removed and following debug information is printed:
"DETAIL: 12560 dead row versions cannot be removed yet."
As per suggestion, we ma
Hi All,
We have been trying to implement the streaming replication on one of our
test servers. We have set archive_xlogs to on. But on the standby server,
when we start the database we get error the following errors:
LOG: shutting down
LOG: database system is shut down
LOG: database system was
Hi,
Can any one of you suggest how the archived Xlogs can be cleaned in
postgres-9.
We want to use streaming replication and have set the "wal_level" to
"hot_standby" and "archive_mode" to "on".
Regards,
Nimesh.
Hi,
Can anybody highlight how to use unnest function from postgres 8.4 on
multi-dimensional array?
Below is the sample table structure:
Table "public.multi_array_test"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-+--+---
id | integer |
user_id | bigint[] |
Sample data:
1
Hi,
When we do a ps U postgres command, we find some connection in BIND status:
10088 ?Ss 0:00 postgres: chk production xxx.xx.x.xx(48672) BIND
10090 ?Ss 0:00 postgres: chk production xxx.xx.x.xx(48674) BIND
We are connecting to the database using pgpool for load balanci
at 5:07 PM, Glyn Astill wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 19/3/09, Nimesh Satam wrote:
> >
> > We are receving the following error in the postgres
> > database logs:
> >
> > 2009-03-19 02:14:20 PDT [2547]: [79-1] LOG: duration:
> > 0.039 ms stateme
Hi,
I am not sure if sending this to the right place. I did try to get the
answer from pgpool mailing list but no luck . Would appreciate if someone
can help here.
We are receving the following error in the postgres database logs:
2009-03-19 02:14:20 PDT [2547]: [79-1] LOG: duration: 0.039 ms
Hi,
We have recently installed slony and tsrted replication on one of our test
machines. When we start inserting data in to the replicated database, the
replication is taking properly. Over a period of time the lag increases
between the two database.
Looking further we found that, sl_log_1 and sl
Hi,
We are trying to implement slony as a replication tool for one of our
database. The Insert and updates have increased by approximately double
making some of our important script slow.
The database in concern is a warehouse and we have added additional primary
key to support slony by using def
All,
While running a Select query we get the below error:
ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Failed on request of size 192.
Postgres Conf details:
shared_buffers = 256000
work_mem =15
max_stack_depth = 16384
max_fsm_pages = 40
version: 8.1.3
We are using 8gb of Primary memory for the server
, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nimesh Satam wrote:
> > Heikki,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. Will try to do the changes and rivert back. I had
> one
> > more requirement for partitioning.
> >
> > I wanted to inherit
(cost=520.63..520.63 rows=28363 width=23)
-> Seq Scan on rs (cost=0.00..520.63 rows=28363
width=23)
-> Hash (cost=435.63..435.63 rows=24063 width=24)
-> Seq Scan on radv (cost=0.00..435.63 rows=24063
width=24)
(41 rows)
Can you
All,
We are trying to implement partition on one tables on date basis. the
overall cost and timming and cost of the query is increasing on the Append
of the child table output. As shown below:
*-> Append (cost=0.00..112217.92 rows=2752906 width=52) (actual time=
2454.207..20712.021 rows=2752905
, Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:28:32PM +0530, Nimesh Satam wrote:
> We have already used analyze command on the table.
> We have also ran the vacuum analyze command.
>
> But they are not helping.
Is there any data in the table? What doe
Heikki,
Thank you for replying.
We have already used analyze command on the table.
We have also ran the vacuum analyze command.
But they are not helping.
Thanks,
Nimesh.
On 6/11/07, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nimesh Satam wrote:
> While monitioring we not
Hi,
While monitioring we noticed that there are no details in the pg_statistics
for a particular table. Can you let us know what might be the reason? Also
what steps can be taken care for adding the statistics?
Note: The queries which are running on this table are taken longer time then
al the
Hi,
I tried to create a standby system as per the steps mentioned in the
following article
http://archives.postgresql.org/sydpug/2006-10/msg1.php.
Can anybody let me know the steps which are supposed to be followed to make
the standby machine for read access? and how it should be one.
Al
Hi,
I am trying to vaccum one of the table using the following command:
VACUUM FULL ANALYZE VERBOSE table_name;
But for some reason the table vaccuming is not going ahead. Can you guys let me know what the problem is.
Regards,
Nimesh.
number is increasing pretty fast for template0.
Please let me know if this a problem.
Regards,
Nimesh.
On 9/7/06, Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 16:01 +0530, Nimesh Satam wrote:> I noticed that the age of template0 is increasing very rapidly..Can
>
Hi!..
I noticed that the age of template0 is increasing very rapidly..Can you please let me know how we can control this and what causes such problems.
We also noticed that the database slow downs heavily at a particular time..Can you suggest any tools which will help in diagnosing the ro
20 matches
Mail list logo