On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Artem Tomyuk wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I've noticed that there is a huge (more than ~3x slower) performance
> difference between KVM guest and host machine.
>
>
Is this unique to KVM, or do similar things happen with other virtualizers?
--
Mike Nolan
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Robert DiFalco
wrote:
>
> Thanks David, my example was a big simplification, but I appreciate your
> guidance. The different event types have differing amounts of related data.
> Query speed on this schema is not important, it's really the write speed
> that matte
I
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Robert DiFalco
wrote:
> First off I apologize if this is question has been beaten to death. I've
> looked around for a simple answer and could not find one.
>
> Given a database that will not have it's PKEY or indices modified, is it
> generally faster to INSE
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07/07/2015 05:15 PM, Wes Vaske (wvaske) wrote:
>
>> The M500/M550/M600 are consumer class drives that don't have power
>> protection for all inflight data.* (like the Samsung 8x0 series and
>> the Intel 3x0 & 5x0 series).
>>
>> The M
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:52 PM, David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Michael Nolan wrote:
>
>> The only thing I can come up that's happened since last night was that we
>> ran the nightly vacuum analyze on that d
Last night I was doing some tuning on a database The longest query I was
running was taking around 160 seconds. I didn't see much change in the
running time for that query, even after restarting PG.
Today, with roughly the same system load (possibly even a bit heavier
load), that query is runnin
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 11:07 AM, Mel Llaguno wrote:
> > Care to elaborate? We usually do not recommend specific kernel versions
> > for our customers (who run on a variety of distributions). Thanks, M.
>
> You should.
>
>
> http://www.databasesoup.com/2
