Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)

2006-01-18 Thread Michael Crozier
> We had someone working on that for a while; I don't think it got to > the point of being something ready to unleash on the world. Interesting. I will dig around the mailing list archives too see how they went about it... for my own curiosity if nothing else. If you happen to know offhand,

Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)

2006-01-18 Thread Michael Crozier
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 14:52 pm, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > I think it's a good idea, but you should take a look at the recently > added functionality that allows you to investigate the contests of the > FSM via a user function (this is either in 8.1 or in HEAD; I can't > remember which). I will

Re: [PERFORM] Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)

2006-01-18 Thread Michael Crozier
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 08:54 am, Chris Browne wrote: > To the contrary, there is a whole section on what functionality to > *ADD* to VACUUM. Near but not quite off the topic of VACUUM and new features... I've been thinking about parsing the vacuum output and storing it in Postgresql. All