l this to them next
week.
Regards
MauMau
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
o is especially interesting. I'll tell my aquaintance to
check it, too.
Regards
MauMau
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
From: "Claudio Freire"
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:34 PM, MauMau wrote:
Yes, I understand it is natural for the response time of each transaction
to
double or more. But I think the throughput drop would be amortized among
multiple simultaneous transactions. So, 50% throughput decr
From: "Merlin Moncure"
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:06 AM, MauMau wrote:
Hello,
I've heard from some people that synchronous streaming replication has
severe performance impact on the primary. They said that the transaction
throughput of TPC-C like benchmark (perhaps DBT-2) decrea
ybody give
me any performance evaluation result if you don't mind?
Regards
MauMau
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
