such an offering would exist for Europe (guess that's just a matter of
time).
Regards
Markus Wanner
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
n how long it takes me to get the
> PostgreSQL benchmarks I'm using to work on my machine. But everything
> will be on Github at
>
> http://github.com/znmeb/linux_perf_viz/tree/master/blktrace-howto
>
> as it evolves.
Cool, looking forward to reading that.
Regards
Markus W
ce. So there are pretty awful
spikes for writing latency (IIRC more than 100ms has been measured on
cheaper disks).
A battery backed cache could theoretically flatten those, as long as
your avg. WAL throughput is below the SSDs avg. writing throughput.
Regards
Markus Wanner
--
Sent via pgsql-
ant for all types of storages.)
Does there already exist a tool giving (most of) these measures? Am I
missing something interesting? What would you expect from a block device
benchmarking tool?
Regards
Markus Wanner
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To
Hi,
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
I'm not sure how those cards work, but my guess is that the CPU will
go 100% busy (with a near-zero I/O wait) on any sizable workload. In
this case, the current pgbench configuration being used is quite small
and probably won't resemble this.
I'm not sure how they w
