On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Marko Kreen wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>> On a 4 CPU machine, if I run pgbench -c10 -j10 with dummy queries
>>> (like "select 1;" or &quo
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On a 4 CPU machine, if I run pgbench -c10 -j10 with dummy queries
> (like "select 1;" or "set timezone...") against 2 instances of
> pgbouncer, I get nearly twice the throughput as if I use only one
> instance.
>
> A rather odd workload, maybe, b
On 7/15/09, David Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > From security standpoint, wasting more cycles on bad passwords is good,
> > as it decreases the rate bruteforce password scanning can happen.
> >
> > And I cannot imagine a sc
On 7/15/09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>
> > toruvinn wrote:
> >> I was always wondering, though, why PostgreSQL uses this approach and not
> >> its catalogs.
>
> > It does use the catalog for most things. THe flatfile is used for the
> > situations where the catalogs are not y
On 6/27/08, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Berkus) writes:
> > Jonah,
> >
> >> Hmm, I didn't think the Skype tools could really provide federated
> >> database functionality without a good amount of custom work. Or, am I
> >> mistaken?
> >
> > Sure, what d
On 12/1/07, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, the only way to parallelize a query in Postgres is to use
> pgpool-II.
FYI: plproxy issues queries for several nodes in parallel too.
--
marko
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: exp
