Re: [PERFORM] bad planning with 75% effective_cache_size

2012-04-19 Thread Istvan Endredy
Hi everybody, thanks for the so many responses. :) > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Josh Berkus >>> 7500ms >>> http://explain.depesz.com/s/ >> This plan seems very odd -- doing individual index lookups on 2.8m rows >> is not standard planner behavior.  Can you confirm that all of your >> othe

Re: [PERFORM] bad planning with 75% effective_cache_size

2012-04-17 Thread Istvan Endredy
Hi, thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't help. We have tried it earlier. 7500ms http://explain.depesz.com/s/ctn ALTER TABLE product_parent ALTER COLUMN parent_name SET STATISTICS 1000; ALTER TABLE product ALTER COLUMN parent_id SET STATISTICS 1000; ANALYZE product_parent; ANALYZE product; q

Re: [PERFORM] bad planning with 75% effective_cache_size

2012-04-13 Thread Istvan Endredy
ple_cost = '0.01'; 12ms http://explain.depesz.com/s/Ypc this was the query: select distinct product_code from product p_ inner join product_parent par_ on p_.parent_id=par_.id where par_.parent_name like 'aa%' limit 2 Any idea? Thanks in advance, Istvan 2012

[PERFORM] bad planning with 75% effective_cache_size

2012-04-05 Thread Istvan Endredy
Hi, i've ran into a planning problem. Dedicated PostgreSQL Server: "PostgreSQL 9.1.3 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46), 64-bit" Memory: 8GB 4CPUs The problem is reduced to the following: there are 2 tables: -product (3millions rows, 1GB) -produc