On Jun 16, 2011, at 20:43, Greg Smith wrote:
> The layout you proposed (OS+WAL , data) might be effective, but if your write
> volume is low it may not be much of an improvement at all over a simple RAID1
> of two drives. The odds that you are going to correctly lay out individual
> sections o
On Jun 16, 2011, at 20:29, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> On 2011-06-16 17:09, Haestan wrote:
>> I am evaluating hardware for a new PostgreSQL server. For reasons
>> concerning power consumption and available space it should not have
>> more than 4 disks (in a 1U case), if possibl
Hi,
I am evaluating hardware for a new PostgreSQL server. For reasons
concerning power consumption and available space it should not have
more than 4 disks (in a 1U case), if possible. Now, I am not sure what
disks to use and how to layout them to get the best performance.
The cheaper option woul
