> My guess is you can exclude rows with WHERE if the the
> column used is an run-time computation involving an ad-hoc CASE.
* that you can't
--
Evan Carroll
System Lord of the Internets
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make chan
mizer *could* more easily
optimize this if you had used coalesce rather than an ad-hoc method
with CASE. My guess is you can exclude rows with WHERE if the the
column used is an run-time computation involving an ad-hoc CASE.
--
Evan Carroll
System Lord of the Internets
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
operator elegantly;
and, even then it would require you to update your code, only slightly
to a lesser degree than writing the column names.
Evan Carroll
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
On 8/28/07, Kevin Grittner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:22 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Evan Carroll"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I ran vacuum full after loading both dbs.
>
> Have you r
From: "Evan Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:21:54 -0500
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy)
On 8/28/07, Kevin Grittner <[EMAIL P
-- Forwarded message --
From: Evan Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 28, 2007 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy)
To: Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 8/28/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
resql, and can be found at all times with the nick
EvanCarroll.
--
Evan Carroll
System Lord of the Internets
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
832-445-8877
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org
