At 08:17 07/01/2010, Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>Our DB has an audit table which is 500M rows and growing. (FYI the objects
>being audited are grouped semantically, not individual field values).
>
>Recently we wanted to add a new feature and we altered the table to add a new
>column. We are backfill
At 05:24 02/11/2009, you wrote:
>The only reason I can think of for wanting to compress very small
>datums is if you have a gajillion of them, they're highly
>compressible, and you have extra CPU time coming out of your ears. In
>that case - yeah, you might want to think about pre-compressing the
