Mr. Tom Lane
--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I need some help in a TPCH 100GB benchmark.
> > Here I put the query #19, the explain and the
> "top"
> > for it.
>
> IIRC, this is one of
Hi folks,
I need some help in a TPCH 100GB benchmark.
I described our settings in:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-04/msg00377.php
Some queries are taking to long to finish (4, 8, 9,
10, 19,20 and 22) and I need some help to increase the
system performance.
Here I put the q
ones.
The last thing is that Jan forgets to mention that
Teradata doesnt show up now but in older lists shows
3TB and 10TB results.
regards
Eduardo
--- Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo Almeida wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Im doing the
8AM -0700,
> Eduardo Almeida used the keyboard:
> >
> > - The configuration of the machine is:
> > Dual opteron 64 bits model 240
> > 4GB RAM
> > 960 GB on RAID 0
> > Mandrake Linux 64 with Kernel 2.6.5 (I compiled a
> > kernel for this test)
>
Folks,
Im doing the 100GB TPC-H and Ill show the previous
results to our community (Postgres) in 3 weeks before
finishing the study.
My intention is to carry through a test with a VLDB in
a low cost platform (PostgreSQL, Linux and cheap HW)
and not to compare with another DBMS.
So far I can te