On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, afancy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My PostgreSQL server has two CPUs (OS: Fedora 11), each with 4 cores.
> Total is 8cores. Now I have several clients running at the same time
> to do insert and update on the same table, each client having its own
> connection. I have made two te
* *Message-id*:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-07/msg00293.php>>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Dave Youatt wrote:
Greg, those are compelling numbers for the new Nehalem processors.
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Doug Hunley wrote:
>
>> Just wondering is the issue referenced in
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-11/msg00415.php
>> is still present in 8.4 or if some tunable (or other) made the use of
>> hyperthreading a
Apologies if this is a FAQ, but...
Given linux's (mis)accounting/reporting of per-process memory, including
shared memory (see for example this page:
http://lwn.net/Articles/230975/) how does postgresql interpret and use
the information that's provided? Does it use the information as-is?
Does i
