OTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:25 PM
To: Chris Mckenzie
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance/Maintenance test result collection
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:50:22PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to plan for a performan
Title: Performance/Maintenance test result collection
Hi.
I'm trying to plan for a performance test session where a large database is subject to regular hits from my application while both regular and full database maintenance is being performed. The idea is to gain a better idea on the impa
y 02, 2006 at 05:47:15PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote:
> I've come to the conclusion I need to simply start tracking all
> transactions and determining a cost/performance for the larger and
> frequently updated tables without the benefit and penalty of
> pg_statio.
I'll bet it
cost/performance for the larger and frequently updated tables without the benefit and penalty of pg_statio.
- Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:39 PM
To: Chris Mckenzie
Cc: 'pgsql-performance@postgresql.org&#x
Title: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
Hi everyone.
I've got a quick and stupid question: Does Postgres 7.4 (7.x) support vacuum_cost_delay?
For all my googles and documentation reading I've determined it's not supported, only because I can't find a 7.x doc or forum post claiming other
