complied. I'm not going to touch if that was a smart
instruction to give :-)
Brian
-Original Message-
From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Brian Tarbox
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rafal Kedziorski;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PE
>Afaik, your original posting said postgresql was 3 times slower than mysql
>and that you are going to leave this list now. This implied that you have
>made your decision between postgresql and mysql, taking mysql because it is
>faster.
Well, that shows what you get for making implications. The c
> I don't think Brian has any interest in being helped.
>I suspect he'd made up his mind already.
With all due respect Tom, I don't think I'm the one demonstrating a closed
mind.
Rather than trying to figure out whats going on in my head, how about
figuring out whats going on in my database? :-)
ED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shridhar
Daithankar
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
On Friday 04 July 2003 17:57, Brian Tarbox wrote:
> I recently took a system from MySQL to Postgres. Same HW, SW, same data.
> The major o
ly 04, 2003 8:36 AM
To: Brian Tarbox; Rafal Kedziorski; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
> I recently took a system from MySQL to Postgres. Same HW, SW, same data.
> The major operations where moderately complex queries (joins on 8 tables).
>
> The result
standard answers. It was still much much much slower.
Brian Tarbox
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rafal
Kedziorski
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Hi,
has anybody tested
