Re: [PERFORM] Connection pooling - Number of connections

2014-03-29 Thread Brett Wooldridge
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> On 03/24/2014 06:27 AM, Brett Wooldridge wrote: >> This was one of the reasons I was proposing the fixed pool design. In my >> experience, even in pools that maintain a minimum number of idle &g

Re: [PERFORM] Connection pooling - Number of connections

2014-03-26 Thread Brett Wooldridge
Hi, Brett Wooldridge here, one of the principals of HikariCP. I thought I'd wade into the conversation pool a little myself if you guys don't mind. Speaking to David's point... >> Reaching the maxPoolSize from the minPoolSize means creating the >> connections at t

Re: [PERFORM] Connection pooling - Number of connections

2014-03-24 Thread Brett Wooldridge
, Gavin Flower < gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote: > On 25/03/14 13:23, Brett Wooldridge wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Gavin Flower < > gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote: > >>Surely no code changes are required, as one can simply set the min >

Re: [PERFORM] Connection pooling - Number of connections

2014-03-24 Thread Brett Wooldridge
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Gavin Flower wrote: > Surely no code changes are required, as one can simply set the min and > max pool sizes to be the same? > > Cheers, > Gavin > To be sure it can be implemented that way, but its a question of design targets. For example, if a pool is allowe

[PERFORM] Connection pooling - Number of connections

2014-03-24 Thread Brett Wooldridge
Hi, Brett Wooldridge here, one of the principals of HikariCP. I thought I'd wade into the conversation pool a little myself if you guys don't mind. Speaking to David's point... >> Reaching the maxPoolSize from the minPoolSize means creating the >> connections at t