Re: [PERFORM] Postgres bulk insert/ETL performance on high speed servers - test results

2016-09-07 Thread Mike Sofen
From: Jim Nasby [mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 12:22 PM On 9/4/16 7:34 AM, Mike Sofen wrote: > You raise a good point. However, other disk activities involving > large data (like backup/restore and pure large table copying), on both > platforms, do not

Re: [PERFORM] Postgres bulk insert/ETL performance on high speed servers - test results

2016-09-07 Thread Jim Nasby
On 9/4/16 7:34 AM, Mike Sofen wrote: You raise a good point. However, other disk activities involving large data (like backup/restore and pure large table copying), on both platforms, do not seem to support that notion. I did have both our IT department and Cisco turn on instrumentation for my

[PERFORM] debug_assertions is enabled in official 9.6rc1 build

2016-09-07 Thread Mkrtchyan, Tigran
Hi *, just installed official rpm from http://yum.postgresql.org/ to check functionality and performance of 9.6rc1. Unfortunately, binaries are compiled with debug_assertions=on, which makes any performance testing useless. Regards, Tigran. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsq