> dbnasg403-12a:/vol/dodpupdbtst03 on /ORA/dbs03/PUPDBTST type nfs (rw,
> actimeo=0,hard,nointr,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,tcp,timeo=600)
> dbnasg401-12a:/vol/dodpupdbtst02 on /ORA/dbs02/PUPDBTST type nfs (rw,
> actimeo=0,hard,nointr,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,tcp,timeo=600)
>
> to
>
> dbnasg403-12a:/v
> Very much agree with this. Because SSD is fast doesn't make it suited for
> certain things, and a streaming sequential 100% write workload is one of
> them. I've worked with everything from local disk to high-end SAN and even
> at the high end we've always put any DB logs on spinning disk.
> > The slave (I don't have control on the master) is using 2 NFS file
> > systems, one for WALs and another one for the data, on Netapp controllers:
> >
> > dbnasg401-12a:/vol/dodpupdbtst02 on /ORA/dbs02/PUPDBTST type nfs
> >
> (rw,remount,hard,nointr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,tcp,actimeo=0,timeo=
