Re: [PERFORM] Setting vacuum_freeze_min_age really low

2013-05-09 Thread Andres Freund
On 2013-05-09 12:09:04 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > In the past, setting vacuum_freeze_min_age (vfma) really low (say to > > 1 or 5) would have caused lots of extra writing work due to > > dirtying extra pages for freezing. This has b

Re: [PERFORM] Setting vacuum_freeze_min_age really low

2013-05-09 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2013-03-25 13:31:17 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > In the past, setting vacuum_freeze_min_age (vfma) really low (say to > 1 or 5) would have caused lots of extra writing work due to > dirtying extra pages for freezing. This has been our stated reason to > keep vfma high, despite the o

Re: [PERFORM] Setting vacuum_freeze_min_age really low

2013-05-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > In the past, setting vacuum_freeze_min_age (vfma) really low (say to > 1 or 5) would have caused lots of extra writing work due to > dirtying extra pages for freezing. This has been our stated reason to > keep vfma high, despite the ob