Dave Cramer writes:
> This query is a couple orders of magnitude slower the first result is
> 9.2.1, the second 9.1
Thanks for sending me the test case off-list. I found the reason why
I'd not been able to reproduce the problem: the index you're hoping it
will use is declared
"note_sets_parent_
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 02:15:45PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 09:29 PM, Denis wrote:
> > Ok guys, it was not my intention to hurt anyone's feelings by mentioning
> > MySQL. Sorry about that.
> It's pretty silly to be upset by someone mentioning another DB product.
> I wouldn't worry
