henk de wit writes:
> For some reason the mailinglist software seems to block the email as soon as
> the planner details are in it, so I pasted those on pastebin.com:
> http://pastebin.com/T5JTwh5T
You need a less horrid estimate for the join size. Possibly an ANALYZE
on the parent table (stre
Yes a physical index would be one solution - but it's not the only one.
The indexes could be treated in parallel in their physical places
where they are. That's why I called it still logical.
I don't think so that I would loose all benefits of partition since an
index could adapt itself when part
Hi,
For some reason the mailinglist software seems to block the email as soon as
the planner details are in it, so I pasted those on pastebin.com:
http://pastebin.com/T5JTwh5T
Kind regards
