On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 05:24 AM, Colin Taylor wrote:
>
>> My thoughts are: surely 0-row updates dont cause this or have impact on
>> the vacuum. I'm still doing the same updates after all why have things
>> degenerated so badly?
>>
>
> What exactly is
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Anibal David Acosta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a table with about 10 millions of records, this table is update and
> inserted very often during the day (approx. 200 per second) , in the night
> the activity is a lot less, so in the first seconds of a day (00:00:01) a
>
Hi,
I have a table with about 10 millions of records, this table is update and
inserted very often during the day (approx. 200 per second) , in the night
the activity is a lot less, so in the first seconds of a day (00:00:01) a
batch process update some columns (used like counters) of this table
