Sergio Gabriel Rodriguez writes:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You wouldn't happen to be
>> trying to use a 9.0 or later pg_dump would you? Exactly what 8.4.x
>> release is this, anyway?
> Tom, thanks for replying, yes, we tried it with postgres postgres 9.1 and
> 9.2 a
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> You wouldn't happen to be
> trying to use a 9.0 or later pg_dump would you? Exactly what 8.4.x
> release is this, anyway?
>
>
>
Tom, thanks for replying, yes, we tried it with postgres postgres 9.1 and
9.2 and the behavior is exactly the same.
Sergio Gabriel Rodriguez writes:
> Our production database, postgres 8.4 has an approximate size of 200 GB,
> most of the data are large objects (174 GB), until a few months ago we used
> pg_dump to perform backups, took about 3-4 hours to perform all the
> process. Some time ago the process becam
Our production database, postgres 8.4 has an approximate size of 200 GB,
most of the data are large objects (174 GB), until a few months ago we used
pg_dump to perform backups, took about 3-4 hours to perform all the
process. Some time ago the process became interminable, take one or two
days to pr
