On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 01:23 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>> Craig James wrote:
>>
>>> It claims to be "the world's fastest database."
>>
>>
>>> [link where they boast of 80,000 tps read-only]
>>
>>
>> 20,000 tps? Didn't we hit well over 300,000 tps i
On 06/20/2012 10:51 AM, Michal Szymanski wrote:
We started to think about using SSD drive for our telco system DB.
> Because we have many "almost" read-only data I think SSD is good
candidate
for our task. We would like to speed up process of read operation.
Many read-only operations can be
On 06/25/2012 01:23 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Craig James wrote:
It claims to be "the world's fastest database."
[link where they boast of 80,000 tps read-only]
20,000 tps? Didn't we hit well over 300,000 tps in read-only
benchmarks of PostgreSQL with some of the 9.2 performance
enhancem
