On 05/21/2012 10:41 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
How fast is the link to your SAN? If it's Gigabit, then 80MB/s would
be pretty reasonable.
Wow, I didn't even think of that. I was looking up specs on the SAN. :)
Those stats are pretty horrible for sequential reads. The SAN should
improve random
How fast is the link to your SAN? If it's Gigabit, then 80MB/s would
be pretty reasonable.
Also SANs are normally known for very good random access performance
and not necessarily for fast sequential performance.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Jan Nielsen
wrote:
> This is outside of PG perfor
This is outside of PG performance proper, but while testing pg_dump and
pg_restore performance on local-storage versus SAN storage I noticed a big
performance drops on in the SAN configuration. I'm told that both local
storage and SAN storage are 15k drives with local-storage running dual
RAID1 con
