¿Wizard Merlin?
>
> De: Merlin Moncure
>Para: David Boreham
>CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>Enviado: Miércoles 16 de Mayo de 2012 13:53
>Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] SSD selection
>
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:45 PM, David Boreham wrote:
>> On 5/16/2012 11:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:45 PM, David Boreham wrote:
> On 5/16/2012 11:01 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> Although your assertion 100% supported by intel's marketing numbers,
>> there are some contradicting numbers out there that show the drives
>> offering pretty similar performance. For examp
On 5/16/2012 11:01 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Although your assertion 100% supported by intel's marketing numbers,
there are some contradicting numbers out there that show the drives
offering pretty similar performance. For example, look here:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4902/intel-ssd-710-200g
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David Boreham wrote:
> On 5/15/2012 12:16 PM, Rosser Schwarz wrote:
>>
>> As the other posters in this thread have said, your best bet is
>> probably the Intel 710 series drives, though I'd still expect some
>> 320-series drives in a RAID configuration to still be
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
Is it established practice in the Postgres world to separate indexes
from tables? I would assume that the reasoning of Richard Foote -
albeit for Oracle databases
