Robert Poor wrote:
> @kevin: I hear you. (I'm deeply steeped in Ruby on Rails and
> foolishly assume that it's easy to read.) With that in mind:
>
> \d user_associations
> id | integer | not null default
> nextval('followings_id_seq'::regclass)
I assume that
@merlin, @kevin: Thank you both -- I'll try your suggestions as soon
as I get back to the mothership.
@kevin: I hear you. (I'm deeply steeped in Ruby on Rails and
foolishly assume that it's easy to read.) With that in mind:
\d user_associations
Table "public.u
Robert Poor wrote:
> among users that follow leader 321, who are the most widely
> followed leaders?", or more formally, find all the users that are
> followers of user 321 (via inner join on F1) Of those users,
> tally up their leaders so we know which leaders are most popular.
It sounds like
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Robert Poor wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:30, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> Why are you joining twice to the parent table? If you're trying to
>> recurse without a with clause, then wouldn't you join the last table
>> to the one before it?
>
> I'm FAR from being
