On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Marcus Engene wrote:
> The problem I have with battery backed raid controllers is the battery part.
> They're simply not reliable and requires testing etc which I as a rather
> insignificant customer at a generic datacenter cannot have done properly. I
> have how
On 10/28/11 5:45 , Kevin Grittner wrote:
Marcus Engene wrote:
Every now and then I have write peaks which causes annoying delay
on my website
Does anyone here have any recommendations here?
For our largest machines we put WAL on a RAID1 drive pair dedicated
to that tas
Hello,
I want to report that I have now solved the challenges I ran into using
KNN for US zipcode searching. I've found the new approach to not only be
viable, but to benchmark about 3x faster for our own real-world
application than the previous approach we used, involving
cube_distance() and ear
Thanks Tom!
Regret the delay in reply, but two of the three guesses were spot-on and
resolved the doubt. 8.4.9 does take care of this case very well.
On 10/27/2011 01:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I suspect that you're just fooling yourself here, and the "optimized"
query is no such thing.
:) I act
On 28.10.2011 14:02, Albe Laurenz wrote:
We selected a 30MB bytea with psql connected with
"-h localhost" and found that it makes a huge
difference whether we have SSL encryption on or off.
Without SSL the SELECT finished in about a second,
with SSL it took over 23 seconds (measured with
\timing
