On 2011-02-03 22:48, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
Yes they're useful, but like a plastic bad covering a broken car window,
they're useful because they cover something that's inherently broken.
Awesome. Now we have a car anolog
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
>
> With 300k rows, count(*) isn't a good test, really. That's just on the edge
> of big-enough that it could be > 1-second to fetch from the disk controller,
>
1 second you say ? excellent, sign me up
70 seconds is way out of bounds
I don'
09.02.11 01:14, Dave Crooke написав(ла):
You will get the same behaviour from any database product where the
query as written requires type coercion - the coercion has to go in
the direction of the "wider" type. I have seen the exact same scenario
with Oracle, and I view it as a problem with th
