Jesper Krogh writes:
> On 2010-05-30 20:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, hmm, I really doubt that that represents reality either. A page
>> access is by no means "free" even when the page is already in cache.
>> I don't recall anyone suggesting that you set these numbers to less
>> than perhaps 0.01.
On 2010-05-30 20:34, Tom Lane wrote:
Jesper Krogh writes:
testdb=# set seq_page_cost = 0.1;
SET
testdb=# set random_page_cost = 0.1;
SET
Well, hmm, I really doubt that that represents reality either. A page
access is by no means "free" even when the page is already in cache.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Brad Nicholson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> Anybody on the list have any experience with these drives? They get
>> good numbers but I can't find diddly on them on the internet for the
>> last year or so.
>>
>> http://www.stec
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Anybody on the list have any experience with these drives? They get
> good numbers but I can't find diddly on them on the internet for the
> last year or so.
>
> http://www.stec-inc.com/product/zeusiops.php
I'd heard that they were a popu
