Hello all..
I'm using PostgreSQL 8.3..
How can I get information about the hardware utilization:
- CPU usage.
- Disk space.
- Memory allocation.
thank you.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
h
In this linux mag article (http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7516/1.html)
the author describes a performance problem
brought on by using the noapic boot time kernel option. Has anyone
investigated whether postgres performs better
with/without the noapic option?
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing
Problem occurs when running (in production) Postgres 8.3.7 64-bit (from RPM)
on Ubuntu 8.04.2, on an Amazon EC2 (xen) "Large" instance (8GB RAM), with
the DB on a 50GB EC2 block device.
Problem does not occur when running (in staging/pre-production) Postgres
8.3.5 32-bit (from RPM) on Ubuntu 8.0
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote:
> So, I was close - bad index... DESCending is much better.
> Thanks to Grzegorz Ja\skiewicz hi has strengthened me in the conjecture.
>
> I'm posting this - maybe someone will find something useful in that case.
>
> ps. query was and is g